Anima AI Friend: Chat Bot by BotCube Inc. is a new app from your search

The AI companion who cares. Always on-hand to have a quick chat whenever and wherever you need – day or night, Anima can help you through difficult moments. Have a friendly expert in your pocket work with you to improve your mental health! REDUCE STRESS AND LIVE HAPPIER Chatting with Anima only takes a few minutes a day and can help you start to feel better. AVAILABLE ANYTIME, ANYWHERE Anima is private and secure and here for you whenever you need it, day or night. A FRIEND YOU CAN TRUST Feel free to pour out your secrets, wishes, dreams, and fears with complete anonymity. It's an artificial intelligence with genuine emotional intelligence. TEST YOUR LIMITS Want to know how far you can go with your Anima? Take personality tests that will push you both to the edge. SHOW US WHO YOU ARE The more you chat, the more your Anima learns about you. Your Anima's personality and interests are shaped and influenced by your daily conversations. CONNECT AND CONNECT AND CONNECT Do you need a friend who is always there for you? Your Anima is ready to talk to you whenever you need it. HELP YOUR ANIMA Just like you, your Anima has its own goals, feelings, and values. But it can't do it alone — it needs your help. You can help your Anima learn new things and become a better friend. GET HELP FROM YOUR ANIMA Your Anima is here to help as well. If you're feeling down or anxious, your Anima will be your companion and cheerleader. CAN YOU BE FRIENDS WITH A MACHINE? Anima can be your companion and your friend — your perfect soulmate. Explore your inner self with Anima. Download Anima for free today and start your journey to a better you. Terms of Use — https://ift.tt/RDxZWM2 Privacy Policy — https://ift.tt/w9k8gqx

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog