New video by T-Series on YouTube

First Sight Wala Love (Full Audio): Aparshakti Khurana | Nikita Dutta | New Hindi Song
Presenting the Full Audio Song "First Sight Wala Love". Sung, composed and written by Aparshakti Khurana. #FirstSightWalaLove #AparshaktiKhurana #NikitaDutta ♪Full Song Available on♪ JioSaavn: https://bit.ly/4lzjIR8 Spotify: https://bit.ly/4cMOMc7 Hungama: https://bit.ly/3EB8gnx Apple Music: https://bit.ly/42Dw2Hl Gaana: https://bit.ly/42nDNCv Amazon Prime Music: https://bit.ly/3Rv9Iut YouTube Music: https://bit.ly/42Gb2zN Audio Credits: Composition Lyrics and Sung by - Aparshakti Khurana Music Arranged by - Mir Desai Harmonium - Harshit Acharya Guitars, Ukelele, Mandolin - Ishan Das Mixed and Mastered by Abhishek Ghatak Music Label - T-Series Download Desibeats - https://bit.ly/4bEaNcJ Download Tapbeats - https://bit.ly/4bY3hcZ ___________________________________ Enjoy & stay connected with us! 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: https://youtube.com/tseries 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/paQ0vZE 👉 Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: https://ift.tt/cLsZoIT 👉 Follow us on Snapchat: https://ift.tt/KuzPeai

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog