Skip to main content

Anti-Immigrant Extremists Want to Use this 226-Year-Old Law to Implement a Mass Deportation Program


Anti-immigrant extremists have repeatedly used “invasion” rhetoric to divide our communities and advance their anti-immigrant agenda. Donald Trump has promised to “carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history” and, at recent campaign rallies, gone so far as to pledge that, if re-elected, he will invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to facilitate a draconian mass deportation program. Though Trump made similar promises when in office, we know that his administration would be far more aggressive in its efforts to use this colonial-era law to deport millions. Below, we breakdown what this means for our communities.

What is the Alien Enemies Act?

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 was passed as part of the infamous Alien and Sedition Acts, which were a series of laws passed by a Federalist-led Congress to address fears about an impending war with France. While the other three laws have since expired or been repealed, the Alien Enemies Act remains active.

The law has not changed much since it was passed in 1798. Right now, it permits the president to apprehend, restrain, and remove noncitizens during a “declared war” or if the U.S. faces an “invasion or predatory incursion” by another country or foreign government. The law applies to “natives” of another country, which potentially includes people who were born abroad, but who are long-term residents of the U.S. Past presidents have detained or deported noncitizens with legal status and noncitizens raised in the United States. While the government has never sought to use the Act to detain citizens, we have ample reason to fear that Trump would seek to break that norm.

Many fear that a second Trump administration would seek to use this law to justify indefinite detention and remove people from the country swiftly and without judicial review. Historically, people have been subject to removal under the Act without any fundamental due process safeguards, which makes it ripe for civil liberties abuses. For example, the Act’s text does not require that noncitizens receive a hearing prior to detention or removal, and the government has read it to provide limited opportunities for administrative or judicial review.

There is also a real risk that the Trump administration’s rhetoric and its mass deportation agenda will lead to racial profiling by federal, state, and local law enforcement. The rhetoric surrounding the Alien Enemies Act could embolden law enforcement agents to act on their perceptions of a person’s ancestry or nationality, leading to wrongful arrest, detention, and deportation, including of U.S. citizens.

The Alien Enemies Act Has a Sordid Past

Throughout this country’s history, the Act has been used to target people merely on the basis of their ancestry or nationality. The act was first used during the War of 1812 against British nationals, and later used by President Woodrow Wilson during World War I against nationals of the German Empire, Austria-Hungary, and other foreign nations. The last time this wartime authority was invoked, during World War II, lead to the incarceration of noncitizens of primarily Japanese descent – the precursor to the internment program targeting Japanese Americans – that marked one of the most shameful moments in American history. In 1988, when Congress apologized and provided reparations for Japanese internment, it acknowledged the application of the law lead to fundamental violations of the civil liberties and constitutional rights of individuals of Japanese ancestry, and that the government’s actions were motivated largely by “racial prejudice” and “a failure of political leadership.”

The Law Hinges on the Idea of an Invasion or Predatory Incursion

Historically, the Act has been used only when Congress has declared war, and Supreme Court precedent has acknowledged that the law may only be used as a wartime authority. But its text also includes actual or threatened “invasion or predatory incursion” by a foreign nation or government. There is, of course, no military invasion or incursion occurring in the United States, so it would be unlawful for Trump to invoke the Act.

Nonetheless, invasion rhetoric has been a lynchpin of Trump’s presidential campaign. During a nomination acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention, Trump falsely claimed that the “greatest invasion in history” was happening at the southern U.S. border with Mexico, and such rhetoric has been used to justify his extreme anti-immigrant stances and policy proposals. Increasingly, we’ve seen other anti-immigrant extremists use “invasion” theory to facilitate their illegal actions. In Texas, Governor Greg Abbott has repeatedly claimed an invasion at the U.S.-Mexico border to show just cause for the entirety of Operation Lone Star, an anti-immigrant border enforcement scheme that allows for the arrest of U.S. citizens and others far from the southwest border. Abbott has even used it to justify the construction of a 1,000-foot barrier in the Rio Grande River.

The consequences of allowing this kind of fearmongering to trigger the Act would be staggering. Take, for example, Trump’s claim of an “invasion” of immigrants from Mexico. If courts were to accept that baseless claim, the result could be presidential authority to deport all Mexican nationals — even lawful permanent residents who have lived in this country for decades, raising families that include U.S. citizen children and building their lives in our communities.

The Time for States to Act is Now

The Alien Enemies Act’s history reminds us that presidents can invoke vague and overbroad emergency powers to unfairly and wrongly target people based on political ideology, ancestry, or nationality. Trump’s pledge to invoke this outdated law is a harrowing call to action to ensure our government does not repeat the mistakes of the past.

Elected leaders need to be vigilant and speak out now against mass deportations, including the potential invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. While Trump and his surrogates are couching their claims in terms of crime, drugs, and cartels, it is all too clear that their mass deportation agenda extends to millions of our loved ones, neighbors, and co-workers.

That’s why the ACLU is calling on state and local government leaders to create a firewall to ensure that no state and local personnel or resources are tapped by the federal government to enact mass deportations and any other civil liberties violations. At the local level, we will urge mayors and city councils to come together to protect and support families targeted by Trump’s mass deportation drive and other attacks.

The bottom line is that a president cannot unilaterally make good on threats to conduct the largest deportation drive in our nation’s history, or to do so using the Alien Enemies Act and other legal authorities. Without the assistance of state and local government agencies, a second Trump administration will find it much harder to identify, arrest, and detain our immigrant neighbors and loved ones. The ACLU – and our more than 4 million members – are prepared to fight alongside states to combat any attacks on people who are immigrants and ensure that mass deportations never take root in our communities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New video by T-Series on YouTube

Aila Re Aillaa (Video) Sooryavanshi | Akshay, Ajay, Ranveer, Katrina, Rohit | 5 November Presenting first song "Aila Re Aillaa " from the most awaited movie of the year "Sooryavanshi". The movie is staring Akshay Kumar, Ajay Devgn, Ranveer Singh and Katrina Kaif in the lead role. The biggest party anthem of the year, this track "Aila Re Aillaa" is sung by Daler Mehndi and the Music Recreated by Tanishk Bagchi and the new lyrics are penned by Shabbir Ahmed. The song originally is composed by Pritam and penned by Nitin Raikwar. Reliance Entertainment, Rohit Shetty Picturez In association with Dharma Productions and Cape Of Good Films presents “Sooryavanshi”. Produced by: Hiroo Yash Johar, Aruna Bhatia, Karan Johar, Apoorva Mehta and Rohit Shetty Directed by: Rohit Shetty Star Cast: Akshay Kumar, Ajay Devgn, Ranveer Singh and Katrina Kaif. SONG CREDITS Song - Aila Re Aillaa Singer - Daler Mehndi Music Reworked by - Tanishk Bagchi Programmed and Arranged by -...

Latest AI tools in 2025

Artificial Intelligence has reached a new height in the year 2025. With the help of powerful tools, AI has made it possible to transform business, revolutionalize the way we live, and the way we work. Chatbots are one of the many amazing things that AI has brought to us in 2025. They have made it possible for businesses to provide 24/7 customer service without the need for human interruption. But chatbots are just the tip of the iceberg of what AI has to offer in 2025. With natural language processing (NLP), AI has made it possible for machines to understand human language and emotions. This has paved the way for virtual assistants like Siri and Alexa to assist with everyday tasks and questions. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is also one of the growing trends of AI in 2025. This tool facilitates the automation of repetitive tasks, which frees up time for more important work. This improves productivity and efficiency in businesses and organizations. As for the healthcare industry, ...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...