Skip to main content

New video by T-Series on YouTube

Tu Saamne Aaye (Lyrical) Jubin Nautiyal ft. Yohani | Sakshi, Mateen | Rocky, Navjit B | Bhushan K
Presenting the song Tu Saamne Aaye with lyrics sung by Jubin Nautiyal, Yohani. Composed by Jubin Nautiyal, Rocky and penned by Rocky Khanna Gulshan Kumar and T-Series Presents Bhushan Kumar's "Tu Saamne Aaye" ♪Full Song Available on♪ JioSaavn: https://bit.ly/3EYPcNu Spotify: https://ift.tt/vq8gb47 Hungama: https://bit.ly/3tWHSvi Apple Music: https://ift.tt/4UCdNQY Amazon Prime Music: https://amzn.to/3F7N85X Wynk: https://bit.ly/3GFXtqI Resso: https://bit.ly/3B4jBYr iTunes: https://ift.tt/4UCdNQY YouTube Music: https://bit.ly/3XxCLPJ Song Credits: Song: Tu Saamne Aaye Singer: Jubin Nautiyal, Yohani Music: Rocky - Jubin Lyrics: Rocky Khanna Featuring: Jubin Nautiyal, Yohani, Sakshi Joshi, Mateen Vakil Music Produced by Prasanna Suresh Bass by Ashwin Shriyan Guitars by Aditya Shankar Mixed and Mastered by Eric Pillai, Future sound of Bombay Video Credits: Director: Navjit Buttar D.P : Shinda Singh Assistant Directors : Karan Maini, Jagmohan Singh, Mohit Kapoor Art director : Sonu Arts Costume stylist: Shruti Jamal Line Production: V sign Production Editor: Harmanvir DI Colorist : Qazman VFX Artist: Gagan Matharoo BTS: Sachin Thakur Production House : Donati Media Local Production: Abbas Production Jubin Nautiyal’s Make up & Hair stylist: Josephine maximus Castelino Makeup & Hair artist: Raja & Sanju. Production House: Donati Media ___________________________________ Enjoy & stay connected with us! 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: http://bit.ly/TSeriesYouTube 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/T64fJ1d 👉 Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/InstagramTseries


View on YouTube

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

The Young Singaporean's Guide to Saving & Investing on a Small Salary (2025 Edition)

The Young Singaporean’s Guide to Saving and Investing on a Small Salary Introduction Living in Singapore can feel overwhelming when you’re just starting your career. Rents are high, kopi prices keep rising, and saving on a monthly salary of $2,500–$3,000 might seem impossible. Yet, many young Singaporeans have proven that with the right habits, even a small income can grow into long-term financial security. The key is to start early, be consistent, and leverage the tools available to you — especially CPF, robo-advisors, and smart budgeting. This guide breaks down practical steps you can take to save and invest, even if you’re earning on the lower side. 💰 1. Start with the Basics: Budgeting the 50/30/20 Way If you’re earning $2,800 a month (a common starting salary for many graduates), here’s how the 50/30/20 rule can be applied in Singapore: 50% Needs ($1,400) – rent, transport (MRT/Grab), phone bills, meals. 30% Want...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...