Liked on YouTube: vivo X50 Pro Unboxing & First Look - Crazy Gimbal Quad Camera

Liked on YouTube: vivo X50 Pro Unboxing & First Look - Crazy Gimbal Quad Camera | Giveaway🔥🔥🔥

vivo X50 Pro Unboxing & First Look - Crazy Gimbal Quad Camera | Giveaway🔥🔥🔥
Enter here: https://ift.tt/38ZNWIl Namaskaar Dosto, is video mein maine aapse Vivo X50 Pro Smartphone ke baare mein baat ki hai aur share ki hai iski Unboxing video aur Overview. Vivo X50 Pro mein 6.56" ka Full HD+ Super AMOLED Screen hai 90Hz refresh rate ke saath aur laga hai Snapdragon 765G Octa Core 5G processor saath mein hai 8GB RAM aur 256GB ki Internal Storage. Vivo X50 Pro mein Quad Gimbal Camera Setup 48MP Primary Cam with Gimbal + 8MP Ultrawide/Macro + 13MP Portrait Camera + 8MP 5X periscope zoom camera, aur saath mein hai 32MP Selfie Camera. Vivo X50 Pro mein 4315mAh ki battery hai jise aap 33W charger se Fast Charge kar sakte hai. Mujhe umeed hai ki aapko Vivo X50 Pro ki yeh video pasand aayegi. X50 Price: 8GB+128GB - 34,990INR 8GB + 256GB - 37,990INR X50 Pro Price: 8GB + 256GB - 49,990INR Check here: Amazon - https://amzn.to/2AXwurb Flipkart - https://bit.ly/3erEHSf E-Store - https://bit.ly/2Whj0hs Share, Support, Subscribe!!! Subscribe: http://bit.ly/1Wfsvt4 Android App: https://ift.tt/2mrm9Gy Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/c/TechnicalGuruji Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/technicalguruji Facebook: https://ift.tt/1Pi5LDP Facebook Myself: https://goo.gl/zUfbUU Instagram: https://ift.tt/1OW2vue Google Plus: https://ift.tt/1Pi5LDS Website: https://ift.tt/2mcM6KV Merchandise: https://ift.tt/2lN4Vbu About : Technical Guruji is a YouTube Channel, where you will find technological videos in Hindi, New Video is Posted Everyday :)
via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1l4KySAb4k

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog