Liked on YouTube: Oppo Reno 4 Pro Unboxing & First Look | 90Hz AMOLED | 65W | 48MP Quad CAM

Liked on YouTube: Oppo Reno 4 Pro Unboxing & First Look | 90Hz AMOLED | 65W | 48MP Quad CAM | GIVEAWAY🔥🔥🔥

Oppo Reno 4 Pro Unboxing & First Look | 90Hz AMOLED | 65W | 48MP Quad CAM | GIVEAWAY🔥🔥🔥
Enter here: https://ift.tt/2Esuit5 Namaskaar Dosto, is video mein maine aapse Oppo Reno 4 Pro Smartphone ke baare mein baat ki hai aur share ki hai isi Oppo Reno 4 Pro ki Unboxing aur Overview. Oppo Reno 4 Pro mein 6.5" FHD+ E3 Super AMOLED Bezel Less Screen hai 90Hz refresh rate ke saath aur isme hai Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Processor saath mein hai 8GB RAM aur 128GB ki Internal Storage. Oppo Reno 4 Pro mein Quad Rear camera setup hai 48MP + 8MP + 2MP +2MP ka aur saath mein hai 32MP ka front facing camera. Oppo Reno 4 Pro mein 4000mAh ki battery hai aur saath mein aapko 65W SuperVOOC charging ka option bhi milta hai. Iske alawa isme Under Display Fingerprint Scanner aur Face Unlock ka option bhi hai. Yaha ek giveaway bhi hai aap mein se kisi ek viewer ke liye isi Oppo Reno 4 Pro smartphone ka. Mujhe umeed hai ki aapko Oppo Reno 4 Pro ki yeh unboxing video pasand aayegi. Oppo Reno 4 Pro Price: 8Gb + 128GB = 34,990INR Share, Support, Subscribe!!! Subscribe: http://bit.ly/1Wfsvt4 Android App: https://ift.tt/2mrm9Gy Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/c/TechnicalGuruji Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/technicalguruji Facebook: https://ift.tt/1Pi5LDP Facebook Myself: https://goo.gl/zUfbUU Instagram: https://ift.tt/1OW2vue Google Plus: https://ift.tt/1Pi5LDS Website: https://ift.tt/2mcM6KV Merchandise: https://ift.tt/2lN4Vbu About : Technical Guruji is a YouTube Channel, where you will find technological videos in Hindi, New Video is Posted Everyday :)
via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPOsMqVEDv0

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog