New video by T-Series on YouTube

Be Happy: Superstar (Film Version) | Abhishek A Bachchan | Nora Fatehi | Inayat V | Mika S | Harsh
Presenting the Song "Superstar (Film Version)" from the film Be Happy. Starring Abhishek A Bachchan, Nora Fatehi & Inayat Verma. Sung by Mika Singh, composed by Harsh Upadhyay & written by Pranav Vatsa & Sukriti Bhardwaj. #BeHappy #AbhishekBachchan #NoraFatehi #InayatVerma Audio Credits: Music Composer – Harsh Upadhyay Lyrics – Pranav Vatsa, Sukriti Bhardwaj Singer - Mika Singh Kids Singers -Palakshi Dixit, Pratyush Anand, Atharv Bakshi, Vishwaja Jadhav, Anshika S Chonkar Music Producers- Harsh Updhayay & Jay Mavani Mixing & Mastering- Abhishek Ghatak Final Arrangements & Sound Design- Harsh Updhayay Vocals Recorded By- Pranjal Borah at Neo Sound Kid Singers Managed By- Devansh Sharma Film Credits: Cast: Abhishek A Bachchan, Inayat Verma, Nora Fatehi, Johny Lever, Harleen Sethi, Nasser Director: Remo D'Souza Producer: Lizelle Remo Dsouza, Remo Dsouza Entertainment DOP: Vijay Kumar Arora (Dadu) Associate Producer: Bimal Oberoi Creative Producer: Prachi Tyagi Production Designer: Tanvi Patil Choreographer: Rahul Shetty Associate & 2nd Unit Director: Stanley Menino Dcosta First AD: Yusuf K Khan Costumes: Jerry Dsouza Line Producer & Post Producer: Gaurav Chandelia Choreography Team: Sonal Vichare, Pratik Surve, Ashish Sanade, Pratiksha Sutar Hair & Make up: Neeraj Navare, Rekha Chouthani and team Download Song Beat: https://bit.ly/3Cjh24R ___________________________________ Enjoy & stay connected with us! 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: https://youtube.com/tseries 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/5et1CVn 👉 Follow us on X: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: https://ift.tt/EQdCTup

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog