Skip to main content

How We Are Protecting the Right to Vote on the Anniversary of Shelby v. Holder


Ten years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered one of the most devastating blows to voting rights in our lifetime: Shelby County v. Holder. The ruling struck down key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), which had successfully protected Black, Brown, Indigenous, and other marginalized voters for decades. In her dissent in that case, the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg warned that the court’s decision was “like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm.” Today, we are drenched in the downpour. Shelby County unleashed a torrent of voter suppression and other discriminatory voting laws unlike anything the country had seen in a generation. The VRA provides many critical mechanisms for ensuring that people from racial and language minorities across the nation can exercise their fundamental right to vote without encountering discriminatory barriers. While the 15th Amendment was adopted in 1870 and — at least on paper — prohibited the denial of the right to vote on account of race or color, in reality, states and localities defiantly continued policies and practices designed to prevent Black and Brown voters from casting ballots. This 10th anniversary of the devastating Shelby County decision confirms our collective need to double down on our efforts to fully restore the VRA to its full power, which Congress must do by passing the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. The VRA created strong, enforceable legal protections that rooted out many of these racist voter suppression tactics. As originally designed, it featured a crucial requirement known as “preclearance” that mandated that states and localities with long records of racially discriminatory voting practices seek federal approval before making any alterations to their voting laws. Unlike litigation, which occurs after a law is passed, preclearance uniquely curtailed racially discriminatory measures before they were implemented and could irreversibly taint an election. One decade ago, the Supreme Court dismantled and gutted this crucial prophylactic measure. Now, even places with the most egregious records of racially discriminatory voting practices face an easier path to suppressing the vote of the most marginalized communities. On top of this, eight years after Shelby, the Supreme Court weakened another provision of the VRA — Section 2, a nationwide ban on voting practices that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or language — making court challenges to discriminatory tactics even harder. The Supreme Court fortunately bucked this trend in its recent decision, Allen v. Milligan, a case brought by the ACLU, the NAACP LDF, and partners. In Milligan, the court upheld a lower court’s ruling that Alabama’s congressional districts map violated Section 2 by diluting Black voting power. In doing so, the court is reaffirming Section 2’s protections against racial gerrymandering. However, while an important victory, this decision simply preserved what remains of the VRA and did nothing to address the previous blows the court dealt. We will continue to challenge anti-voter laws and discriminatory voting practices in the courts. But our work does not end there. This 10th anniversary of the devastating Shelby County decision confirms our collective need to double down on our efforts to fully restore the VRA to its full power, which Congress must do by passing the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. Voters across the country still face arbitrary restrictions on absentee voting, bans on providing water to voters as they wait in hours-long lines, drop box limitations, polling site closures, gerrymandering, and other restrictive policies that disproportionately burden voters of color, voters with disabilities, and elderly voters, among others. As we head into another election year, we face an urgent need to grow and activate our collective power. That’s why the ACLU, on this anniversary of Shelby County v. Holder, is launching a brand-new Democracy Defender program, powered by members like you across the country who want to join us on the front lines in our work to protect voting rights and end racially discriminatory voting practices. The right to vote and our democracy face increasing attacks at the federal, state, and local levels. So, we must fight back at every level. Democracy Defenders will do just that. Supporters like you will work alongside us in some of the biggest voting rights battles across the country. Plus, we will keep you in the loop as we work together for equitable access to the ballot, to preserve the integrity of our electoral process, and in defense of the very foundations of our democracy. We need you with us to keep fighting Donate today

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New video by T-Series on YouTube

THE PUNJAABBAN SONG (Teaser) JugJugg Jeeyo | Varun Kiara Anil Neetu | Gippy Zahrah Tanishk Romy Presenting teaser of the song #ThePunjaabbanSong from movie #JugJuggJeeyo starring Varun Dhawan, Kiara Advani, Anil Kapoor, Neetu Kapoor, Maniesh Paul & Prajakta Koli. Viacom18 Studios & Dharma Productions present A Dharma Productions Film JUGJUGG JEEYO Starring Varun Dhawan, Kiara Advani, Anil Kapoor, Neetu Kapoor, Maniesh Paul & Prajakta Koli Directed by Raj Mehta Produced by Hiroo Yash Johar, Karan Johar, Apoorva Mehta Story by Anurag Singh Screenplay and Dialogues by Rishhabh Sharrma Screenplay by Anurag Singh & Sumit Bhateja In cinemas 24th June, 2022. Song CREDITS Song Name: THE PUNJAABBAN SONG Singers: Gippy Grewal, Zahrah S Khan, Tanishk Bagchi & Romy Music - Tanishk Bagchi Programmed and Arranged - Tanishk Bagchi Lyrics - Tanishk Bagchi Music Label: T-Series Original Song Credits Nach Punjaban By Abrar Ul Haq from the album Nach Punjaban Courtesy of Moviebox (Bi

85 साल की शांताबाई पवार का कमाल देख हर कोई हैरान, 'लाठी-काठी' का करतीं हैं शानदार प्रदर्शन

पुणे में इन दिनों एक 85 साल की बुजुर्ग महिला खूब चर्चा में हैं। ये सड़कों पर 'लाठी-काठी' का प्रदर्शन करती हैं। बुजुर्ग महिला का ये कमाल देखकर हर कोई हैरान है। आप भी देखिए। from Latest And Breaking Hindi News Headlines, News In Hindi | अमर उजाला हिंदी न्यूज़ | - Amar Ujala https://ift.tt/3jAPGwr via IFTTT

Arizona’s High Court Must Protect Abortion Access

Today, the Arizona Supreme Court will consider whether to resurrect a more than 150-year-old criminal ban on virtually all abortions. The court’s decision could allow that law to take precedence over Arizona’s modern abortion laws, including those passed just last year by the people’s current elected representatives. This ban was originally struck down in 1973, thanks to a lawsuit brought by Planned Parenthood and physicians in Arizona, and since that time has been superseded by a comprehensive scheme that regulates abortion as a lawful medical procedure. But an anti-abortion activist and County Attorney are now asking the Arizona Supreme Court to turn back the clock. No one should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term against their will and face the life-altering consequences of being denied essential health care, but reviving this antiquated law in full would do just that — and, at the same time, throw Arizona’s entire contemporary legal code into confusion. The origins of Arizo