New video by T-Series on YouTube

Damaged 3 | Aamna Sharif & Shrenu Parikh | Official Trailer
Damaged 3 is the third instalment of Hungama’s blockbuster Hindi original show, Damaged. The series is a psychological crime drama known for being helmed by a strong female character in each of its previous seasons. The third season features not one, but two strong women who go head-to-head in a bone-chilling life-and-death race. Damaged 3 stars television superstars, Aamna Sharif and Shrenu Parikh in the lead. Rashmi (Aamna Sharif) is a headstrong cop renowned for her bravery and courage. In what is a male-dominated profession, she not only rose to the top quickly but also began to command respect from her colleagues and other people in the town. Shanaya (Shrenu Parikh) is a rookie journalist whose search for a path-breaking story leads her to Rashmi’s doorstep. With her story on the female supercop becoming a hit, Shanaya is now ready to go to any lengths to get the next big breaking news. Luckily for her, a spate of serial killings in town, gives her the sensational news items she needs for her website. However, her hunger for news and quest for truth puts her in the path of direct collision with Rashmi. With each woman harbouring deadly secrets and vowing to destroy the other, Damaged 3 leads to an explosive showdown and an outcome that none had expected. Produced by Endemol Shine India, Damaged 3 is directed by Ekant Babani and also stars Pulkit Bangia, Yash Bhatia, Vibhuti Upadhaya and Aman Verma in key roles. It will be available to stream from 20th January on Hungama Play and partner networks. Follow us on - Facebook - facebook.com/HungamaPlayAPP Instagram - instagram.com/hungama_play/ Twitter - twitter.com/Hungama_Play Sharechat - https://ift.tt/2QToA6v ___________________________________ Enjoy & stay connected with us! 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: http://bit.ly/TSeriesYouTube 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/2csI2TM 👉 Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/InstagramTseries

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog