New video by T-Series on YouTube

Aarti (Audio) | Bhuj: The Pride Of India | Sonakshi S |Shankar M, Priya M, Sonali C,Amar M, Abhilash
Gulshan Kumar Presents A Select Media Holdings LLP Production Presenting the full audio of the song "Aarti " from the movie #BhujThePrideOfIndia, The film is starring Ajay Devgn, Sanjay Dutt, Sonakshi Sinha, Ammy Virk, Nora Fatehi, Sharad Kelkar, Pranitha Subhash, and Ihana Dhillon. Aarti is sung by Shankar Mahadevan, Priya Malik, Sonali Chandratre and the music is composed by Amar Mohile and the lyrics are penned by Abhilash. Enjoy & stay connected. Bhuj: The Pride of India - Streaming Now only on Disney Plus Hotstar Multiplex. When bravery becomes your armour, every step leads you to victory! Experience the untold story of the greatest battle ever fought. Song: Aarti Singer: Shankar Mahadevan, Priya Malik, Sonali Chandratre Music: Amar Mohile Lyrics: Abhilash Song Produced by - Amar Mohile & Tejas Padave Song Recorded at - AMS & Yashraj Studios Sound Engineers - Shantanu Hudlikar, Abhishek, Manasi Tare & Kamlesh Bharti Song Mixed & Mastered by - Alok Punjani at Studio 24 Live Rhythm - Arrangement by Satyajit Jamsandekar Played by - Satyajit, Ratnadeep Jamsandekar, Anil karanjgavkar, Sachin Bhangre, Vijay Jadhav, Adesh more, Rahul Rupavte, Ganesh Thorat , Sachin sawant, Latesh Parab, Montu Gosavi, Prashant more Chorus - Vivek Naik, Rahul Chitnis, Santosh Bote, Sagar Lele, Mohan Morajkar, Mohan Shravan, Mani Iyer, Vijay Dhuri, Umesh Joshi, Mangesh Shirke Music Label - T-Series ___________________________________ Enjoy & stay connected with us! 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: http://bit.ly/TSeriesYouTube 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/2csI2TM 👉 Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/InstagramTseries

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog