New video by T-Series on YouTube

First Night Sleep Tight Season 2 – A Hungama Original | Official Trailer
Season 2 of First Night Sleep Tight, Hungama Play’s first original show in Bhojpuri, continues to follow the tragically comic life of the newlywed couple, Bisan Kumar and Rekha Rani, and their hilarious attempts to enjoy intimacy while dealing with a family that keeps on interrupting. It’s been a few months since their wedding but Bisan and Rekha haven’t been able to consummate their marriage, still. To top it all, a family situation forces Rekha to visit her family in another town further dampening their plans. But Bisan is determined. In fact, more determined than ever! He packs his bags and reaches his sasuraal to be with his wife hoping that getting away from his own family will probably give him a chance to enjoy the wedded bliss that everyone keeps talking about. To make matters worse, his mother-in-law and wife end up taking a vow to not have any physical relationship with their respective husbands until Rekha’s three sisters get married. Will Bisan and Rekha finally have their near-impossible wedding night? Or will their bad luck continue further? First Night Sleep Tight is produced by Dilip Sood Films, directed by Shivani Thakur and Disha Pundir, and stars Lokesh Pandit, Anchal Kohli, Ravi Chandel, Himanshu Naria, Priya Gupta, Nisha Gupta, Ekta Sharma, Shiva and Ghazala Saad in key roles. The show will be available to stream from 30th June on Hungama Play and partner networks. Follow us on - Facebook - facebook.com/HungamaPlayAPP Instagram - instagram.com/hungama_play/ Twitter - twitter.com/Hungama_Play Sharechat - https://ift.tt/2QToA6v ___________________________________ Enjoy & stay connected with us! 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: http://bit.ly/TSeriesYouTube 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/2csI2TM 👉 Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/InstagramTseries

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog