New video by T-Series on YouTube

Ek Chumma Video | Housefull 4 | Akshay K, Riteish D, Bobby D, Kriti S, Pooja, Kriti K | Sohail Sen
Presenting the first video of the song "Ek Chumma" from the upcoming Bollywood movie "Housefull 4". Housefull 4 is coming to confuse you, put you on a laughing riot and take you through the grandeur of 1419 with a spark of 2019. Come & witness this Epic Reincarnation Comedy. #EkChumma #Housefull4 Akshay Kumar as Bala & Harry Riteish Deshmukh as Bangdu Maharaj & Roy Bobby Deol as Dharamputra & Max Kriti Sanon as Rajkumari Madhu & Kriti Pooja Hegde as Rajkumari Mala & Pooja Kriti Kharbanda as Rajkumari Meena & Neha A Sajid Nadiadwala Franchise Directed by Farhad Samji Produced by Sajid Nadiadwala ______________________________________________________ ♫SONG CREDITS♫ Song: Ek Chumma Singers: Sohail Sen, Altamash Faridi, Jyotica Tangdi Music: Sohail Sen Lyrics: Sameer Anjaan Music Arranged & Produced: Sohail Sen And Suresh Lalwani Rhythm Arranged By Sameer Sen Programming: Sohail Sen And Jagdish Lalwani Mandolin: Chandrakant L Darabuka: Sameer Sen,Sanjeev Sen,Raju Sardar Clarinet: Rajkumar Sodha Violin: Suresh Lalwani Percussions: Suresh Soni,Pratap Rath,John Hunt Music Recorded: Shantanu Hudlikar,Abhishek Khandelwal, Manasi Tare @ Yrf Studios Mixed & Mastered By: Eric Pillai @ Future Sound Of Bombay Assisted By: Michael Edwin Pillai Music On: T-Series ______________________________________________________ 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: http://bit.ly/TSeriesYouTube 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/2csI2TM 👉Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/InstagramTseries

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog