New video by T-Series on YouTube

First Night Sleep Tight – A Hungama Original | Official Trailer
First Night Sleep Tight, Hungama Play’s first original show in Bhojpuri, is a comedy about Bisan Kumar and his wife, Rekha Rani, and their hilarious attempts to consummate their marriage while navigating an extremely relatable busy household of small-town India. A pehelwaan in U.P., Bisan is excited to get married. Though a match made by his father, he can’t wait to start his shaadishuda jeevan with his beautiful wife, Rekha Rani. But, there is only one hitch. They are always surrounded by their extended family, making it near impossible for them to consummate their marriage. While a nosy Bua keeps interrupting them on their wedding night, far-flung rishtedaar keeps dropping in unannounced on days following the wedding. Even his plan to spend a night with his wife in a hotel goes awry and lands them in police custody. On the advice of his friend, he plans a honeymoon but Rani in all her innocence invites her brother for the trip! Will Bisan and Rekha ever find a few moments alone? Or are they destined to remain celibate despite being married? You are cordially invited to witness the most anokhi and amusing shaadi of the year! First Night Sleep Tight is produced by Dilip Sood Films, directed by Disha Pundir and Shivani Thakur, and stars Lokesh Pandit, Anchal Kohli, Ravi Chandel and Himanshu Naria in key roles. The show will be available to stream on Hungama Play and partner from 25th May 2021. Follow us on - Facebook - facebook.com/HungamaPlayAPP Instagram - instagram.com/hungama_play/ Twitter - twitter.com/Hungama_Play Sharechat - https://ift.tt/2QToA6v

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog