New video by T-Series on YouTube

KA KHA Lyrical Video Song | Gandhigiri | Shivam Pathak | T-Series
Presenting the Lyrical Video Song of KA KHA from the upcoming Bollywood film " Gandhigiri" .The film is starring Om Puri,Sanjay Mishra, Anupam Shyam, Mukesh Tiwari , Brijesh Karniwal,Dolly Chawla, Meghna Haldar , Rishi Bhutani, Ravi singh and Ram Sujan singh. The Movie is directed by Sanoj Mishra, Gandhigiri is produced by Aagaman films Pvt. Ltd. of Sudhir Jain & Pratap Singh Yadav. Song ♫Also Available On: iTunes: https://ift.tt/2ecnnpx Hungama :https://ift.tt/2dHGYLH Saavn: https://ift.tt/2ecoyW5 For Caller Tunes : Ka Kha http://bit.ly/2dpGs5I Set "Ka Kha" as your caller tune - sms GNDHI3 To 54646 ________________________________________ Operator Codes: 1. Ka Kha Vodafone Subscribers Dial 5378627995 Airtel Subscribers Dial 5432115927286 Reliance Subscribers SMS CT 8627995 to 51234 Idea Subscribers Dial 567898627995 Tata DoCoMo Subscribers dial 5432118627995 Aircel Subscribers sms DT 6330972 To 53000 BSNL (South / East) Subscribers sms BT 8627995 To 56700 BSNL (North / West) Subscribers sms BT 6330972 To 56700 Virgin Subscribers sms TT 8627995 To 58475 MTS Subscribers sms CT 6330940 to 55777 Videocon Subscribers dial 54321100503073 Telenor Subscribers dial 50016330909 MTNL Subscribers sms PT 8627995 To 56789 SONG CREDITS : Song : Ka Kha Singer: Shivam Pathak Music Director: Shashi Shivamm Lyricist: Lt. Chandresh Singh “Pagal", Sanoj Mishra Choreographer: Subhash Shukla ___________________________________ Enjoy & stay connected with us! 👉 Subscribe to T-Series: http://bit.ly/TSeriesYouTube 👉 Like us on Facebook: https://ift.tt/2csI2TM 👉Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/tseries 👉 Follow us on Instagram: http://bit.ly/InstagramTseries

View on YouTube

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog