Liked on YouTube: Electrochemistry – Formula List and Important Points for Revision - JEE CBSE NEET

Liked on YouTube: Electrochemistry – Formula List and Important Points for Revision - JEE CBSE NEET | COACHENGG APP

Electrochemistry – Formula List and Important Points for Revision - JEE CBSE NEET | COACHENGG APP
COACHengg App Download Link: https://ift.tt/2Y0Mcsw Learn more about the coachengg app: https://youtu.be/VLD8NzXIMyc Physical Chemistry - Revision - Class XII Electrochemistry - Formula List and Important Points In this video, we will revise the topic Electrochemistry This chapter can be easily divided into four unique discussion. We will start with the electrolytic cells, their representation in line notation, Nernst equation and results for Gibbs free energy function. After this, conductivity, cell constant, molar conductivity and Kohlrausch law will be discussed. Conductivity for strong and weak electrolytes will be discussed in brief. Then, we will discuss Faraday’s law of electrolysis, its equation and tendency of elements of get deposited at anode or cathode. Finally we will see topics such as primary cell, secondary cell, fuel cell and corrosion which need to be learnt from your NCERT textbooks. VIDEO BY: Rohit Dahiya (Class XII) for CBSE, JEE and NEET Share this Video - Spread Learning Link to share: https://youtu.be/qg9DJqon6Pw Visit our facebook page https://ift.tt/2OwxiHo Visit our website https://ift.tt/2L3gS7d Visit our youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/coachengg4u COACHENGG4U Follow us on INSTAGRAM https://ift.tt/2DFBj6t Follow us on Google Plus https://ift.tt/34yxJ9W
via YouTube https://youtu.be/qg9DJqon6Pw

Comments

Trump's Attempt to Unilaterally Control State and Local Funding is Dangerous, Dumb, and Undemocratic

The Trump administration has not been subtle in its desire to use federal funding for political punishment. Whether threatening to cut off grants to sanctuary cities, to block financial assistance to states that push back against the president’s demands, or to freeze all federal grants and loans for social services across the country, Trump and his allies want us to believe they can wield the federal budget like a weapon. The reality is that the administration’s ability to withhold or condition funding is far more limited than they let on. The Constitution, Supreme Court precedent, and long-standing federal law stand firmly in the way of this brazen abuse of presidential power. Trump’s Attempted Funding Freeze? Blocked Immediately A week into his second administration, Trump attempted to freeze trillions of dollars in federal grants and loans that fund a vast array of critical services already approved by Congress. If allowed to go into effect, this unprecedented and far-reaching...

Documents Reveal Confusion and Lack of Training in Texas Execution

As Texas seeks to execute Carl Buntion today and Melissa Lucio next week, it is worth reflecting on the grave and irreversible failures that occurred when the state executed Quintin Jones on May 19, 2021. For the first time in its history — and in violation of a federal court’s directive and the Texas Administrative Code — Texas excluded the media from witnessing the state’s execution of Quintin Jones. In the months that followed, Texas executed two additional people without providing any assurance that the underlying dysfunction causing errors at Mr. Jones’ execution were addressed. This is particularly concerning given that Texas has executed far more people than any other state and has botched numerous executions. The First Amendment guarantees the public and the press have a right to observe executions. Media access to executions is a critical form of public oversight as the government exerts its power to end a human life. Consistent with Texas policy, two reporters travelled t...

The Supreme Court Declined a Protestors' Rights Case. Here's What You Need to Know.

The Supreme Court recently declined to hear a case, Mckesson v. Doe , that could have affirmed that the First Amendment protects protest organizers from being held liable for illegal actions committed by others present that organizers did not direct or intend. The high court’s decision to not hear the case at this time left in place an opinion by the Fifth Circuit, which covers Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, that said a protest organizer could be liable for the independent, violent actions of others based on nothing more than a showing of negligence. Across the country, many people have expressed concern about how the Supreme Court’s decision not to review, or hear, the case at this stage could impact the right to protest. The ACLU, which asked the court to take up the case, breaks down what the court’s denial of review means. What Happened in Mckesson v. Doe? The case, Mckesson v. Doe , was brought by a police officer against DeRay Mckesson , a prominent civil rights activi...

Search This Blog